流动式框架
我的理解
其实就是我在obsidian组织笔记的5个要素中提到的，善用tag，link，dataview，组成MOC结构，能使得笔记卡片化的同时，兼具灵活性。
流动式框架，就是卡片笔记法的应有之义。
Fluid Frameworks
Fluid frameworks are non-rigid, highly-flexible organizing structures that you can use as needed.When we talk about fluid frameworks in the “Linking Your Thinking” System, we’re mainly referring to higher-order notes like MOCs and the Home note (but a balanced use of MOCs, folders, tags, and queries can also maintain a fluid structure).
Fluid frameworks are not mutually exclusive. That means a note with its link in an MOC, doesn’t exclusively live in the MOC note. A note can live and link freely. A note can be discovered in as many places as it’s referenced. These are the fundamentals of linking notes together.
Now with higher-order notes like MOCs, we can fluidly add any structure, at any time. But these frameworks offer unique attributes to allow us to work more fluidly than ever before.
Fluid Frameworks vs Rigid Frameworks
Wow…So a fluid framework is a non-essential supporting structure.
Whereas, a typical framework—like a folder—is an essential supporting structure. Delete the folder, and you delete the files within.
And that’s because folders are not fluid; they are a rigid framework. They reduce the number of ways you have to access the notes trapped within. Now it’s worth noting, we do have Global Search, and we can link to notes within folders…so that’s better than it used to be…but there is still no removing the friction that comes from having to twirl down folders X, Y, and Z, just to get to Idea Omega.)
So even though folders alone are rigid, if you expertly use Fluid Frameworks—i.e. HIGHER-ORDER NOTES—to support your linked knowledge, then you can also work back in some smart applications of folders.
That’s why we’re here: to become skilled and confident with how we are deploying the tools that we have to structure our notes in the best way possible.
- See the inspiration for using the term “fluid” at [[ Fluid Taxonomies ]].
- For more see: [[ Benefits of LYT frameworks ]]